An International Publisher for Academic and Scientific Journals
Author Login
Scholars Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences | Volume-5 | Issue-05
The Study of Pronouncing Judgments in Court in Civil Litigation
Dun Xuemei
Published: May 30, 2017 |
336
208
DOI: 10.36347/sjahss.2017.v05i05.006
Pages: 463-467
Downloads
Abstract
There are two modes in adjudicating judgments in China’s civil procedure act amendment 2012, namely sentencing judgments in court, or after court. The second mode is usually defined to the judges announce judgments on a fixed day in the near future. The above two ways of pronouncing are all have their application in judicial practice, but their application is interactive and in a mutual competition. In a long time, there exists the problem that the rate of pronouncing in court is extremely low while the utilization rate of pronouncing after court is increasingly applied inadequately. In addition, the current law has little concrete stipulations on appointed time of pronouncing, therefore there are some defects in judicial practice.