An International Publisher for Academic and Scientific Journals
Author Login 
Scholars Journal of Applied Medical Sciences | Volume-5 | Issue-07
A Comparative Study to Evaluate the Role of Hypofractionated Radiotherapy With Concurrent Weekly Cisplatin Vs Conventional Radiotherapy with Concurrent Weekly Cisplatin in Advanced Carcinoma Cervix
Dr Subhasis Mishra, Dr Niharika Panda
Published: July 30, 2017 | 177 129
DOI: 10.36347/sjams.2017.v05i07.059
Pages: 2809-2816
Downloads
Abstract
Carcinoma cervix is still the most common carcinoma in females in rural area. External beam radiotherapy along with concurrent weekly cisplatin followed by brachytherapy is the standard practice for managing advanced carcinoma cervix. Hypofractionation involves giving a smaller number of larger doses per fraction. There are very few studies on the hypofractionation for cancer cervix. In the coming days, the burden of cervical cancer might even become greater, stretching the limited resources available in developing countries even further. Thus, it is important to evaluate hypofractionated radiotherapy protocols and their potential. The Aim of the present study is to evaluate the response rate of hypofractionated radiotherapy with concurrent weekly cisplatin vs. conventional radiotherapy with concurrent weekly cisplatin in advanced carcinoma cervix and to evaluate and compare the toxicities between the two arms. Forty eligible patients of locally advanced carcinoma cervix who presented a Regional Cancer Centre, and satisfied the eligibility criteria were included in this study. They were divided into two Arms (Arm A (n=19) and Arm B(n=21)) to receive concurrent chemoradiation. Patients in Arm A received EBRT in hypofractionated radiotherapy schedule of 45Gy in 18 fractions @ 250cGy per fraction along with concurrent weekly cisplatin in a dose of 40 mg/m2 followed by brachytherapy. Patients in Arm B received EBRT in conventional schedule of 50Gy in 25 fractions @200cGy per fraction with concurrent weekly cisplatin followed by brachytherapy. Toxicities were assessed on weekly basis according to RTOG toxicity criteria. Response was assessed clinically after 6weeks, 3months and 6months of completion of treatment. The mean age of presentation in our study was 46yrs at stage IIIB. Upper GI toxicity of Grade-2 was found to be 79% in Arm A and 52.4% in Arm B. Lower GI toxicity of Grade-2 was found in 42.1% in Arm A and 23.8% in Arm B which was statistically not significant.