An International Publisher for Academic and Scientific Journals
Author Login 
Scholars Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Sciences | Volume-10 | Issue-11
Sampling Strategies Used to Determine the Microbiological Recovery in Beef Carcass during Slaughter Operations: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis
Omar A. Al-Mahmood, Esraa M. Jweer, Ayman M. Albanna, Firas M. Abed
Published: Nov. 22, 2023 | 264 90
DOI: 10.36347/sjavs.2023.v10i11.002
Pages: 152-164
Downloads
Abstract
The use of microbiological sampling to test beef carcasses for ensuring food safety is a critical activity that food manufacturers need to prioritize. Differences in sampling strategy may affect the quality of the results being reported, possibly leading to misinformed action. Moreover, failure to use an appropriate sampling strategy directly impacts the validity of study results. A systematic literature, covering the period 1965-2020, was conducted to identify sampling strategies used to determine the microbiological quality of beef carcasses in slaughter operations in North America, South America, the European Union, and Australia. Six electronic bibliographic databases were searched for beef microbiological studies in English. Two independent trained reviewers analyzed the full text of articles to assess the quality of the study methods. A total of 30 articles were included for a full review. The number of carcass sites sampled ranged from 1 to 7. Brisket (23/27, 85.2%), flank (17/27, 63%), rump (13/27, 48.1%), and neck areas (8/27, 29.6%) were most often sampled. Most studies described sample characteristics, such as slaughter step to be sampled, carcass sites, and sampling tools used for sampling, sampling frequency, microbiological testing, and handling of sample. Seven had very small sample sizes (10, 18, and 25 beef carcasses). In 13 studies, samples were randomly collected. Only eight reported conducting a power analysis to determine sample size. The average of overall alignment score across all studies with government regulations (except Latin American studies) was 77 points (maximum point was 100). The average score was 62 points in the United States, 78 points in Canada, 90 points in Australia, and 77 points in European countries. Two main sampling tools (swabbing or excision or both) were used in 29/30 studies, with most (24) using swabbing. Microbiological analysis of carcass samples was mentioned in 28/30 studies, 18 used standard plate count, ......