An International Publisher for Academic and Scientific Journals
Author Login 
Scholars Journal of Applied Medical Sciences | Volume-8 | Issue-09
Sociodemographic Status of Propofol and Dexmedetomidine as an Agent of Conscious Sedation in Patients Undergoing Tympanoplasty
Md. Abdur Rahim, Mir Mohammad Rifat Chowdhury, Rahnuma Tasnim, Md. Arif Uddin, Md. Abdul Karim, AKM Akhtaruzzaman, Iqbal Hossain Chowdhury, S. M. Rashidul Hasan
Published: Sept. 17, 2020 | 137 87
DOI: 10.36347/sjams.2020.v08i09.014
Pages: 2043-2051
Downloads
Abstract
Objective: In this study our main goal is to assess sociodemographic characteristics of propofol and dexmedetomidine as an agent of conscious sedation in patients undergoing tympanoplasty. Method: This Randomised prospective clinical trial study was carried out with the patients who underwent tympanoplasty conducted at ENT operation theatre in BSMMU, Dhaka according to inclusion & exclusion criteria from February 2016 to February 2018. ASA I-II patients aged (18-45) years undergoing tympanoplasty were enrolled. Patients were randomized as Group I and Group II by computer-gerenated randomization where there was 30 patients in each group (n=30). Results: Both groups were almost similar in respect to age, weight, height, BMI. Mean age of the patient group-I was 30.93 ± 7.11 and 29.03 ± 7.36 in group-II and among them maximum age was 50 years and minimum age was 19 years in group-I and 44,14 years in group-II. Mean weight of the patient group-I was 58.43 ± 6.88 and 57.50± 5.52 group-II and among them maximum weight was 72 kg and minimum weight was 45 kg in group-I and 67,49 years in group-II. Mean height of the patient group-I was 1.60 ±0.06 and 1.59 ± 0.06 group-II and among them maximum height was 1.73 and minimum height was 1.49 in group-I and 1.79,1.49 meter in group-II.Mean BMI of the patient group-I was 22.72 ± 2.60 and 22.52 ± 2.18 group-II. Demographic data between the two groups were not statistically significant. During the study, a computer-generated randomization table was used to allocate the patients into 2 equal groups, 30 in each where Group I received dexmedetomidine and Group II received propofol. Observations were made during perioperative period for conscious sedation effectiveness on haemodynamics SBP, MAP, DBP, HR, SpO2 on different time intervals, surgical field bleeding status, patient satisfaction, surgeon satisfaction, intraoperative rescue sedation, intraoperative rescue analgesics, postoperative rescue analgesics, time to achieve...........