DOI: https://doi.org/10.36347/sjams.2026.v14i01.004

Pages: 24-34

Background: Asthma generally goes uncontrolled in primary care despite effective inhaled therapies. Persistent symptoms, exacerbations, and avoidable health-care use are driven by suboptimal inhaler technique, poor adherence, unaddressed environmental or personal triggers, and incomplete implementation of guidelines. Objectives: To come up with feasible, primary-care strategies to improve asthma control by tackling modifiable barriers. Methods: The methods that would be taken are the narrative synthesis of evidence with the use of guidelines for practice and these would focus on inhaler technique assessment and education, adherence measurement and support, trigger identification with written action planning, and implementation tools used to embed care that would be guideline-concordant and have been incorporated into routine workflows. Results: Around half of patients use inhalers incorrectly, leading to device-specific critical errors which reduce both the delivery of drug and clinical benefit. Approximately 50% of patients adhere to controller therapy, and decisions to escalate may take place before first verifying this adherence and technique. Trigger counseling works best when incorporated in individualized asthma action plans that outline the exposures and specify the step-up actions when avoidance is not possible. A fast check [using a checklist], a short demonstration video, decision-support prompt [on an electronic health record] and a plan for follow-up. Conclusion: A structured “control circle” that iteratively reviews technique, adherence, triggers and guideline-based adjustments at every visit could provide a feasible means for better asthma outcomes in primary care across different settings.