
An International Publisher for Academic and Scientific Journals
Author Login
SAS Journal of Surgery | Volume-3 | Issue-02
A comparative study on the outcome between extra corporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) and Holmium: YAG LASER ureteroscopic stone removal for upper ureteric stones of sizes ranging between 1cm to 1.5cm: a prospective randomised study
Saptarshi Mukherjee, Tapan Kumar Mandal, Tapas Kumar Majhi
Published: Feb. 28, 2017 |
245
151
DOI: 10.36347/sasjs
Pages: 52-56
Downloads
Abstract
To compare the outcomes of semirigid ureterorenoscopy with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL)
for the treatment of upper ureteric stones of 10 to 15 mm. A total of 70 patients with radioopaque solitary upper ureteric
stone who underwent ESWL or URS with holmium: YAG laser were enrolled in this study. Each group treated with
ESWL and URSL for upper ureteric stones were prospectively compared in terms of retreatment and stone free rates, and
complications. 77.14% (n = 35) of patients who underwent ESWL therapy was stone free at the end of 2nd session. This
rate was 85.71% (n = 35) for patients of URS group (p > 0.05). Retreatment was required in 51.43% of patients who
underwent ESWL. The retreatment rate of cases who were operated with URS was 2.86% (p = 0.0000037, p < 0.05).
Overall complications did not vary significantly between the 2 groups. URS and ESWL have similar outcomes for the
treatment of upper ureteric stones of 10–15 mm. ESWL has the superiority of minimal invasiveness and avoiding general
anethesia. Ureterorenoscopy (URS) with intracorporeal laser lithotripsy has the advantage of obtaining an earlier or
immediate stone-free status. But it is an invasive procedure & needs hospitalization. Complication rates are comparable
between these groups.