An International Publisher for Academic and Scientific Journals
Author Login 
SAS Journal of Surgery | Volume-5 | Issue-08
Forgotten and Encrusted Ureteric Stents: A New Classification
Jihad El Anzaoui, Rachid Zaini, Adil Zemmouri, Omar Ghoundale
Published: July 9, 2019 | 128 80
DOI: 10.21276/sasjs.2019.5.8.1
Pages: 308-312
Downloads
Abstract
The double pigtail stents are commonly used in urology. Their forgetfulness in the urinary ways leads to complications. The encrustation, fragmentation or migration are the most common complications. We conducted a four-year retrospective study to identify Demographic, clinical, radiological and therapeutic aspects of forgotten ureteral stents. Material and Methods: Retrospective study of 16 cases of forgotten and complicated ureteral stents lasts for four years. The encrusted stents were classified according to our own classification: KUB classification. Patients were treated by either extra corporeal shocwaves, endourology or open surgery according to a wellestablished therapeutic algorithm. Results: Average age: 36,6 years. The indications of ureteral stents were dominated by lithiasis: 87%. the average stenting time was 14.6 months. The Complications were dominated by the encrustation: 93%, with only one case of fragmentation and 4 cases of infection. The treatment was multimodal, combining several techniques mainly endourological, with an average number of entry to the operating room of 1.6. The average number of surgical procedures: 1.3. The average hospital stay is 4 days. Conclusion: The forgotten ureteral stents present a real problem of management. The extraction of the stent may require several surgical procedures which are stresfuls for the surgical team and the patient. Our classification allows a better therapeutic and prognosis correlation. Prevention must be at the forefront.