
An International Publisher for Academic and Scientific Journals
Author Login
Scholars Journal of Applied Medical Sciences | Volume-3 | Issue-02
Vasopressors and Inotropes in Shock: Which One to Choose?
Sumit Pal Singh Chawla, Sarabjot Kaur
Published: April 28, 2015 |
155
163
DOI: 10.36347/sjams.2015.v03i02.098
Pages: 1027-1034
Downloads
Abstract
Hemodynamic shock is a final common pathway associated with regularly encountered emergencies including
myocardial infarction, microbial sepsis, pulmonary embolism, significant trauma and anaphylaxis. Shock results in
impaired tissue perfusion, cellular hypoxia, and metabolic derangements that cause cellular injury. Prompt recognition
and intervention are the cornerstones of mitigating the dire consequences of shock. The maintenance of end-organ
perfusion is critical to prevent irreversible organ injury and failure, and this frequently requires the use of fluid
resuscitation and vasopressors and/or inotropes. Despite the widespread use of different vasopressors and inotropes in
various types of shock, the understanding of their clinical effects is often inadequate and therefore, leads to erroneous
therapeutic decision making. This article focusses on reviewing the underlying mechanisms of action of commonly
employed vasopressors and inotropes, analysing published data on their clinical application in various types of shock,
and finally, choosing the right vasopressor(s) and/or inotrope(s) in the management of various shock syndromes.