An International Publisher for Academic and Scientific Journals
Author Login 
Scholars Academic Journal of Biosciences | Volume-2 | Issue-12
Prevalence and Evaluation of Antimicrobial Activity of Dodonaea viscosa Extract and Antibacterial Agents against salmonella Spp. Isolated from Poultry
Shayma Munqith Al-baker, Fadhl Ahmed SaeedAl-gasha’a, Samira Hamid Hanash, Ahmed Ali Al-Hazmi
Published: Dec. 30, 2014 | 66 72
DOI: 10.36347/sajb.2014.v02i12.012
Pages: 901-908
Downloads
Abstract
A total of 200 samples (180 fecal materials and 20 organ samples) were collected from (5 different poultry farms, 10 local poultry shops, 5 houses poultry, 5 Eggs stores shops and 5hand slaughters centers) in Ibb city, Yemen, 2014. According to morphological, cultural, as well as biochemical characterization and serological tests, 59(29.5%) isolates were identified as Salmonella spp. and all Salmonella isolates were categorized by serotype, which comprised of, 37(62.71%) Salmonella Typhimurium serovar, 21(35.59%). Salmonella Enteritidis serovar and 1(1.69%) Salmonella Heidlberg serovar. Antibiotic sensitivity test was done for bacterial isolates and the results showed there were clear differences in antibiotic resistant. Antimicrobial susceptibility of the isolates varies as follows: Ofloxacin (79.66%), Ciprofloxacin (67.80%), Colistin (59.32%) and Gentamycin (52.54%). All of isolates were resistant to Erythromycin, Penicillin and Lincomycin. Antibacterial activity was done for both aqueous and ethanol extracts of Dodonaea viscosa plant by using well and disc diffusion assay. The results indicated that well diffusion assay had best results than disc diffusion assay, the highest inhibition zone was (22)mm for well diffusion and (15)mm for disc diffusion assay, the results observed that ethanol extract had best antibacterial effect than aqueous extract which the percentage of bacterial isolates affected with ethanol extract was(71.19%) comparing with aqueous extract (28.81%)by using disc diffusion assay, while the percentage of bacterial isolates affected with ethanol extract was(88.13%) comparing with aqueous extract (52.54%)by using will diffusion assay.