DOI: 10.36347/sasjs.2022.v08i10.005

Pages: 631-634

Background: Balance anesthesia as an alternative to general anesthesia because it is a less expensive, simpler procedure that is beneficial to our developing countries. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of balanced anesthesia vs general anesthesia for upper abdominal surgery. Method: This comparative study was carried out at tertiary medical hospital from June 2021 to June 2022. Where After obtaining written informed consent, a total 200 patients of ASA grading I & II selected for abdominal surgery randomly. These patients are divided two groups either by balanced anesthesia, n=100 or by general anesthesia, n=100. The patients were visited on the day before surgery for pre anesthetic cheek up. Results: During the study, majority were belonging to 41-50 years age group, 65%.In balanced anesthesia, ASA grading I and II both case 50% were noted followed by total anesthesia duration was 50 minutes – 110Minutes, operation time was 40 minutes – 100 minutes, 6-10 days was hospital duration. Whereas in general anesthesia group, ASA grading I was 75% and 25% II were noted followed by total anesthesia duration was 60 minutes – 130 Minutes, operation time was 50 minutes – 130 minutes, 8-12 days was hospital duration.In balanced anesthesia was less and delayed than general anesthesia. Respiratory pattern and consciousness not satisfactory 10% patient of general anesthesia. Conclusion: According to the findings of this study, patients' consciousness and pain management capacity are better in patients undergoing upper abdominal procedures under balanced anesthesia than in patients undergoing general anesthesia in the post-operative manner.